The legal doctrine that protects brutal policing

Cato's Clark Neily joins Jane to discuss Qualified Immunity - where is came from, why it exists, and what's being done to eliminate it. Clark details how the Supreme Court invented the civil doctrine to protect public workers from personal liability, and details hows it's being used to cloak police officers from being held accountable for unlawful practices.
*This interview was recorded on Monday, June 15th 2020

Relevant cases:
Amy Corbitt, Petitioner v. Michael Vickers, United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Jessop v. City of Fresno, United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Sims v. Labowitz, United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Relevant articles:
"To Make Police Accountable, End Qualified Immunity" by Clark Neily, The Bulwark
"Is Qualified Immunity Unlawful?" by William Baude, California Law Review
"Jury Rejects Damages for Victims of Pot Raid Based on Wet Tea Leaves" by Jacob Sullum, Reason
"George Floyd’s Death Must Be a Catalyst for Accountability" by Clark Neily, Cato

Please visit for more information on Cato's efforts to eliminate Qualified Immunity

Clark Neily (@ConLawWarrior) Vice President of Criminal Justice, Cato Institute
Jane Coaston (@cjane87), Senior Politics Reporter, Vox
Jeff Geld, (@jeff_geld), Editor and Producer
The Weeds is a Vox Media Podcast Network production

Want to support The Weeds? Please consider making a contribution to Vox:

More to explore:
Subscribe to Impeachment, Explained on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Stitcher, Overcast, Pocket Casts, or your favorite podcast app to get stay updated on this story every week.
About Vox
Vox is a news network that helps you cut through the noise and understand what's really driving the events in the headlines.
Follow Us:
Facebook group: The Weeds
Learn more about your ad choices. Visit